Court Looks to Owner’s ‘Proportionate’ Share in Business to Quantify Appreciation in Value
In quantifying marital portion of appreciation of owner spouse’s separate property, trial court relies on owner’s “proportionate” share in company but also considers expert testimony as to third parties’ efforts and owner’s role in generating revenue; court rejects passive factor analysis.
Herbert v. Joubert
In quantifying marital portion of appreciation of owner spouse’s separate property, trial court relies on owner’s “proportionate” share in company but also considers expert testimony as to third parties’ efforts and owner’s role in generating revenue; court rejects passive factor analysis.
Tenn. Appeals Court says DLOM in divorce appropriate under facts of case
A recent Tennessee appeals court decision found that the trial court presiding over a drawn-out divorce had discretion to apply a marketability discount when it valued the owner-spouse’s interest in two companies in 2016.
Michigan court explains treatment of S corp’s retained earnings in divorce
The overarching issue in a recent Michigan divorce case was appreciation. Did the nonowner spouse (wife) have a right to a portion of the increase in value of her husband’s separate property, an S corporation? A related issue, and one that posed a question of first impression in Michigan, was how to treat the company’s retained earnings.
Nebraska Supreme Court Adopts Majority View on Appreciation
State Supreme Court adopts active appreciation rule, aligning itself with majority of jurisdiction that finds appreciation of nonmarital asset is marital property to the extent marital efforts caused it, i.e., the owner or nonowner spouse or both.
Appreciation Case Highlights Contribution by Nonowner Spouse
Increase in value of owner’s minority interests in companies was due to owner’s efforts, which were “facilitated” by nonowner’s work in home; appreciation was active and marital property; no error in awarding nonowner half of profits from sale of assets.
Improper Use of Active/Passive Framework Skewers Valuation
Court says appreciation analysis suffers from improper use of active/passive framework; valuation of company must include all assets, including real estate whose value dropped, where marital labor contributed to overall appreciation of separate property.
Stephens v. Stephens
State Supreme Court adopts active appreciation rule, aligning itself with majority of jurisdiction that finds appreciation of nonmarital asset is marital property to the extent marital efforts caused it, i.e., the owner or nonowner spouse or both.
Nebraska Supreme Court Adopts Majority View on Appreciation
State Supreme Court adopts active appreciation rule, aligning itself with majority of jurisdiction that finds appreciation of nonmarital asset is marital property to the extent marital efforts caused it, i.e., the owner or nonowner spouse or both.
Appreciation Case Highlights Contribution by Nonowner Spouse
Increase in value of owner’s minority interests in companies was due to owner’s efforts, which were “facilitated” by nonowner’s work in home; appreciation was active and marital property; no error in awarding nonowner half of profits from sale of assets.
Allison v. Allison
Increase in value of owner’s minority interests in companies was due to owner’s efforts, which were “facilitated” by nonowner’s work in home; appreciation was active and marital property; no error in awarding nonowner half of profits from sale of assets.
Bair v. Bair
Court says appreciation analysis suffers from improper use of active/passive framework; valuation of company must include all assets, including real estate whose value dropped, where marital labor contributed to overall appreciation of separate property.
Improper Use of Active/Passive Framework Skewers Valuation
Court says appreciation analysis suffers from improper use of active/passive framework; valuation of company must include all assets, including real estate whose value dropped, where marital labor contributed to overall appreciation of separate property.
In Controversial Move, High Court Strikes Active Appreciation Rule
State high court says plain language of property distribution statute does not permit reclassification of nonmarital property as marital property under active appreciation doctrine; court invalidates doctrine and overrules body of case law applying it.
Moore v. Moore
State high court says plain language of property distribution statute does not permit reclassification of nonmarital property as marital property under active appreciation doctrine; court invalidates doctrine and overrules body of case law applying it.
Foreign-Educated Doctor’s Lost Earnings Computed in Personal injury Action
In Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu, 2006 BCSC 522 (CanLII) (decided March 30, 2006), the Supreme Court of British Columbia calculated. the lost past and future earnings of a medical doctor resulting from an auto accident.
Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu
In Dr. Natheir Al-Hendawi v. Manjit Singh Sidhu, 2006 BCSC 522 (CanLII) (decided March 30, 2006), the Supreme Court of British Columbia calculated. the lost past and future earnings of a medical doctor resulting from an auto accident.